Gay columnist admits that the gay agenda is child indoctrination

I have written several articles about the homosexual movement, focusing on the fact that homosexuals are not born but must be “converted” to the homosexual lifestyle. One of the tactics of the homosexual movement is to get their propaganda in the public schools system so that they can have constant access to new “recruits”. Now we have even more proof of the existence of this tactic, shared by a gay reporter. Daniel Villarreal shared the following bit of info while discussing the debate of allowing gay marriage in the state of New York. In his own words,

While gay activists usually deny that they want to indoctrinate children, said Villarreal, “let’s face it—that’s a lie.” “We want educators to teach future generations of children to accept queer sexuality. In fact, our very future depends on it. Recruiting children? You bet we are. “Why would we push anti-bullying programs or social studies classes that teach kids about the historical contributions of famous queers unless we wanted to deliberately educate children to accept queer sexuality as normal?” “I and a lot of other people want to indoctrinate, recruit, teach, and expose children to queer sexuality AND THERE’S NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT,”

You can find the source here.

This is important because 1) it confirms what the Bible teaches (see Romans chapter one) 2) reminds us of the dangers of the homosexual lifestyle. Here are a few articles that I have written on homosexual propaganda being promoted in the public schools

  1. More proof that homosexuality is promoted in the public schools

  2. Teachers, children, and homosexuality

  3. Homosexuals want to manipulate young people

Here are a few articles on the dangers of the homosexual lifestyle.

  1. A good site for info about the dangers of homosexuality

  2. Proof that homosexuals are dangerous, especially for minors!!!

  3. This is scary. More proof of why marriage must remain between one man and one woman.

  4. The Truth about AIDS and Homosexuality

  5. The Truth about AIDS and homosexuality partII

  6. Homosexuality is dangerous for your health

  7. The Homosexual Predator

20 comments on “Gay columnist admits that the gay agenda is child indoctrination

  1. I do believe that Mr Villarreal misused the word “indoctrination” somewhat – his full article makes it clear that his wish is for tolerance of homosexuality to be promoted, rather than practice. You can encourage people to accept gays, or to realize that they may be gay, but you can’t “convert” someone and make them homosexual.

    Compare this issue to one of race. There is a clear difference between teaching one to accept racial minorities, and attempting to teach someone to be a different race – something that’s obviously impossible. I admit that the columnist did muddy the waters with his misuse of terminology.

    • “his wish is for tolerance of homosexuality to be promoted, rather than practice”

      Nice word play but it is really one and the same. When you promote “tolerance” of homosexuality, on the other hand you are also promoting it. It is like promoting condom use among teens. On the other had you are promoting promiscuity. It’s a double edged sword.

      Plus, there is no proof of a gay gene. Homosexuality is a choice. That is what the Bible claims and science cannot prove otherwise.

      Comparing sexuality to race is like comparing apples to oranges. One is an inborn trait while the other is a lifestyle choice. People cannot choose their skin color while they can choose their sexual preferences. Without conversion to homosexuality there would cease to exist homosexuals, that is why every generation must train up the next.

      • I don’t know why you keep asserting that tolerance and promotion are one and the same thing. They are not! Tolerance is about acceptance of something for what it is. It’s about not shedding something in a negative light. Promotion is about emulation; it’s about shinning a positive light on something and making it something to be desired. They are very separate approaches.

        With homosexuality, advocates are asking that heterosexuals tolerate their lifestyle. That means simply accept it for what it is and move on. Don’t treat it as a disease that needs to be cured. Promoting homosexuality would be asserting to people that being gay was somehow the standard to live up to. That homosexuality was in a sense superior to any other kind of sexuality.

        What you are doing (not just you, but the gay-hating community as a whole, and I know about the cover of not hating the person but the sin) is actually heterosexual promotion. You are proposing heterosexuality as something to aspire to. Some people want it taught in schools as some kind of moral standard, at the expense of any other form of sexuality. That, sir, is precisely what promotion is.

        Moreover, you only seem to assert sexuality is a choice when it comes to homosexuality. If you don’t remember the day you chose to be heterosexual, or provide proof of a straight gene, then you can’t claim gay people are choosing homosexuality because they have no proof of a gay gene.

      • Something that is negative must be exposed for what it is, not glossed over for the purpose of propaganda.

        When you promote tolerance toward something, then that which is to be tolerated also gets a plug. Then, to add to it, that which is being promoted, is also presented in a warped manner. Only one side of the homosexual argument is being presented with the purpose of deceiving people. That is propaganda. Homosexuality has a very dark side to it. Just like the free love of the 60’s, 70’s and 80’s. It was not so free since it led to the AIDS epidemic, huge divorce rates, and latch key kids, which society is paying for today. Yet, usually the 60’s, 70’s and 80’s are presented in a positive manner and the negative consequences are just simple ignored. That is propaganda.

        Also, when you promote condom use among teenagers, at the same time you are promoting sex outside of marriage. The two are linked hand in hand. The same is true with tolerance toward homosexuality and the homosexual agenda (promoting homosexuality everywhere). Have you ever read Overhauling Straight America? Just read through the points and see how homosexuality has been and is being systematically promoted. It is not written by born again Christians but homosexuals.

        Homosexuality is not a disease. It is the symptom of mankind’s sin disease. As long as sin exists so will homosexuality, along with all the other forms of sexual immorality.

        I do not hate gays, that is your first assumption and leads you to other mistakes in your logic. You can be against the promotion of something without actually hating the something.

        Heterosexuality is something to aspire to. God created us male and female for the purpose of enjoying a heterosexual relationship (marriage between husband and wife).

        There are other forms of sexuality and they are called sin, deviation from the standard (heterosexuality). Pedophilia is a form of sexuality. So is bestiality. I do not think either should be practiced or taught as an alternative to heterosexuality.

        God chose my sexuality for me when He created me as a male. I choose to be obedient to His decision.

  2. Your “god” sounds more like a tyrant than anything loving. The goddess made me bisexual. She is love in every form. Your god does nothing but spread hate for people in love. It’s bible-thumping Christians like you that make me glad I converted away from the insanity you promote.

    • “Your “god” sounds more like a tyrant than anything loving.”

      First of all, He is not “my” God, He is God. He is very loving. Punishing crime does not change someone from being loving. In fact, if you see that sin destroys and you do not warn people then that would be the opposite of love, that would be hate.

      “The goddess made me bisexual.”

      Your goddess did not make anything, she is just a figment of your imagination.

      You cannot convert from Christianity. I advise you to open the Bible and study It so you can see where you are wrong in so many ways.

      • Very intelligent replies, Erik.

        I do grow so tired of the worn-out “bible-thumper” lines, “hate” (when it most certainly is not displayed), and the usual rhetoric.

        The great irony, as always, is that one side accuses the other of intolerance, yet won’t tolerate a dissenting view. Sad indeed.

        I prefer to live in a society where we do not indoctrinate children and promote what we truly know in our hearts is immoral and will cause them additional harm in their lives down the road.

        Some of us still have moral backbones.

      • “Your god(dess) did not make anything, (s)he is just a figment of your imagination.”

        I believe in the same number of gods that you do. I just believe in one less.

      • Back up, why is your god more real than her’s? Nice try at a quick little dodge there. Personally, I’m sure she can find a book in her closet written by some guys with a beard and a fetish for power that mentions a “goddess.”

        Now you insult my intelligence, dearest. “stupidity?” Really. I thought we left name-calling in the first grade. That’s one of your favorite rebuttals, isn’t it?

      • Three proofs of why God is real (in the tangible world)
        1) Biblical prophecy
        2) The Hebrew people/nation
        3) Transformed lives

        No other “god” has anything like it.

      • False:
        Buddhism has transformed lives, built a nation around it, and has a devoted populace.
        As does Islam, Hinduism, and Judaism.

        Yet you have claimed that these people will not be saved for their religion is false.

        You see only one color of the spectrum of human religion and spirituality.

      • Biblical prophecy teaches that as long as Israel exists (the people) then God exists but the minute that Israel ceases to exists, so will God. Many have tried to wipe out the Hebrews but for some 5,000 years, no nation has been successful. Buddhism, Islam, and Hinduism cannot make that claim.

        When I say transformed lives, I mean set free from slavery to sin. God, the Judeo-Christian God, is the only God who can set a man free from slavery to sin. He gives people the power to say no to sin and temptation. No other religion can offer that. No other religion can “save” a man. That is what Biblical salvation is, the power to overcome sin and temptation moment by moment. All the other religions just teach you to try and be a better person. True religion makes you a better person through a radical transformation (what the Bible calls being born again).

  3. Pingback: Homosexuals strike again, in California « Erik and Elena Brewer's Weblog

  4. Pingback: Homosexuals and child molestation « Erik and Elena Brewer's Weblog

  5. Pingback: Still don’t think homosexuality is dangerous? « Erik and Elena Brewer's Weblog

  6. Pingback: Homosexuals are against the poor and needy of society « Erik and Elena Brewer's Weblog

  7. Pingback: Gillard singes Christian Lobby over offensive gay remark - Page 27 - Christian Forums

  8. Pingback: Are you surprised B. Hussein Obama won, I am not | Erik and Elena Brewer's Weblog

  9. Pingback: Does America really need a LGBT history month? | Erik and Elena Brewer's Weblog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s